Thursday, May 9, 2013

ZNF is a new database idea...


Hi Mike and Mark,

Mike is claiming that ZNF already existed, before Gary (bG). He offers the two links below, as evidence.

I logically disagree.

I say ZNF is one column of serial data, not column correlated. ZNF only co-relates data symbols by: (1) source name and (2) chronological sequence.

It is a time-based array. It has a very different ideological geometry. That’s what makes it so primitive and universal (it’s like the Universe is observing, contexting itself).

Below is what they say ZNF is (two links). I do not think they know what they are talking about. Please interpret their writings for me. Thanks. -g

=====

GLD Notes: “One column of serial-data that is not column correlated,” is the right and true definition of ZNF. If they start by saying “Spreadsheet Design” or “It’s not normalized” and have the data examples laid-out in a matrix form, then they do not have a clue. 

Serial-data is an ideological tectonic shift, to any database specialist, because it does not start with a matrix form. It will take us to explain it to them. ZNF starts with a line form, from a single point. That is a fairly primitive, ideological geometry.

From this line of serial-data, emerging from a single named-point, the correlated matrix is created, in steps and stages, via MapReduction. This is Big Data.

Keep in mind: Gary also created the idea of serial-data. You must first understand serial-data, spewing from a named point, before you can get ZNF. Flow.exe knows this.

Serial-data then leads to the ZNF logical linkage of it (0) to 1-2-3-# Normalized Form data. The only co-relation that serial-data has is a line of symbols, acquired in time, from a named source.

In short, ZNF logical allows us to bidirectionally link serial-data with matrix-data. NOsql can now live well with SQL: it can be logically related (automated).

Technical, that ZNF << to >> #NF is a very big thing to be able to do.  It is nice automation.

====


Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: HPS

Saturday, May 4, 2013

JAD and JADA recurring forms


Hi Mark,  Good question. Let me try to clarify.

.. JAD is a single event. One judgment and action.

.. JADA is Judge and Do Array.

Each JAD is an event. It is a conscious, quantum event, that collapses the wave; affecting the world.

JADA is a vector, a set of JADs, linked together in serial, over time. They have more affect, via intentional alignment.

JADA is a process. JAD is a step in the process.

Each persons world is assemble by their JADA arrays. You remember what you have done and if it worked. You selected to be something. That selections affects you.

You have one conscious JADA and many subconscious JADA streams; operating simultaneously. In fact, each bouton decides to fire or not, based on the flow of Plancks. Boutons decide for their life.

This means each bouton processes its own JADA stream, remembering via lamination. The bouton channel grows bigger with use. It dies without use.

Old dogs can be taught new tricks. This is called neuronal plasticity.

My R&D job is done. You must figure out how to communicate and teach this, so it is productively used.  Good luck. -g


JAD/JADA is a fundamental idea. It is a universal like E=MC2. It can always be used.

Judge is a heurism. Do is an algorithm. JAD links the heurism with the algorithm. JADA links JAD-events into affective (future back) and effective (past forward) vectors of being.

The Universe JADAs. The Milky Way JADAs. A country JADAs. A state JADAs. Boston JADAs. My family JADAs. BIT, Inc JADAs. We the people JADA, in harmony or not.

Plus individually...

The whole mind JADAs. One part of the mind JADAs. A column of neurons JADAs. A single neuron JADAs. A single bouton JADAs. A Planck bit, that drop of energy JADAs. Note: a Planck bit is measures as a vector, joules per second.

Plus ideologically...

Each idea JADAs and each ideal JADAs.

========

All things and non-things jostle and JADA together, for their and our LIFE. Einstein showed that the rules of the Universe are the same everywhere. Each of those rules, in each theory, follow the JADA formation.

Theory is a synonym for JADA: (1) smallest bit, (2) biggest thing, and the recursive (3)context/(4)content process in between. JADA is the context/content process in between. It starts small and connects up, defining a theory.

Judge the context and then Do the content, over and over again. This is the recursive JADA form of formation.